[Cdpaanys] Full docket text of TRO extension

[Bryan O'Malley]

In light of this decision and the text of DOH's guidance yesterday, counsel
has informed us that unless you have an explicit authorization from a plan
to serve an individual, you should stop serving them. The message should be
that DOH has indicated consumers who have started or completed the process
with PPL, regardless of the status of their PA with PPL, are not to be
granted an authorization with their previous FI. Do not anticipate
reimbursement for any consumer for whom you do not have an explicit
authorization.

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025, 3:52 PM Bryan O'Malley <bryan at cdpaanys.org> wrote:

> Judge Block today met with counsel in the Engesser v McDonald case. After
> efforts to arrive at a compromise, the TRO was extended. See below.
>
> Full docket text:
>
> Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Frederic Block: Lisa
> Cleary, Esq., Catlin Ross, Esq. & Elizabeth Jois, Esq. for the plaintiff
> and Rachel Summer, Esq. & Samantha Buchalter, Esq. for the defendants, all
> present. Preliminary injunction hearing held on 4/4/2025. Plaintiffs order
> to show cause [4] seeking a preliminary injunction was discussed further.
> Counsel continue to work together for joint language for a preliminary
> injunction. The terms of the TRO will remain in effect. Counsel will report
> by letter on 4/8/25 by midnight as to their progress on their joint
> preliminary injunction language. Should there be no joint proposal the
> Court will schedule a telephone conference to discuss the matter further.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cdpaanys.org/pipermail/cdpaanys_cdpaanys.org/attachments/20250404/be11d774/attachment.htm>